How to appeal a traffic fine in Spain: alegaciones, recurso and deadlines
A notice normally starts a 20-calendar-day choice: take the 50% reduction or file reasoned allegations with evidence. Reduced payment closes the administrative challenge, but judicial review remains available. This guide shows how to identify the authority, audit service, obtain the file and distinguish limitation, lapse and enforcement.
What the fine is and how it works
Read the issuing authority and case number, not merely the DGT logo. Jurisdiction may lie with DGT, a municipality, an autonomous community with transferred powers or another road authority; file with the body named in the notice.
A resolución sancionadora is the administrative decision imposing the penalty. Alegaciones normally precede it; afterwards, an optional reconsideration appeal (recurso de reposición) or judicial review may be available.
Paying within 20 calendar days usually cuts the money penalty by 50% and ends the administrative procedure. It waives allegations and administrative appeal, not direct judicial review; the normal two-month court clock starts the day after payment. Statutory exclusions mean some offences receive no reduction.
A useful trap competitors often omit: an unopened DEV electronic notice is treated as rejected after 10 calendar days unless access was technically or materially impossible; a BOE notice is treated as served after 20 calendar days. No paper letter does not necessarily mean no deadline.
Who this applies to
- Anyone who received a DGT or municipal fine: speed (radar), parking, zona azul, camera, running a red light.
- The vehicle owner: you must identify the driver if someone else drove — failing to identify is a separate, larger fine.
- Those losing points (graves/muy graves).
- Those who did not get the notification in person but the fine surfaced in TESTRA/TEU/BOE.
NAVICheck my fine — the grounds to appeal and how not to miss the deadline
NAVI will help prepare written objections (alegaciones).
What you are entitled to
- Access the full case file: report, images or video, officer material, service history and the identity of any measuring device.
- Offer relevant evidence and receive a reasoned decision. An officer report carries evidential weight but is rebuttable; refusal of evidence must be explained.
- Check the certificate and current metrological verification of the specific device. There is no universal “5/7% radar discount”: the applicable tolerance depends on device and measuring mode.
- Choose the reduction or the administrative contest, then assess reposición or court after a final decision. Reposición does not automatically suspend enforcement.
Deadlines that matter
- Alegaciones and evidence: 20 calendar days from the day after service; the 50% reduced-payment window normally runs in parallel.
- Where the vehicle was not stopped, a driver-identification request normally allows 20 calendar days. Supply verifiable details and the licence number; a driver outside the Spanish register may require a copy of authority to drive in Spain.
- Optional reposición: one month from the day after service of the final penalty decision. It does not suspend collection; a suspension request is deemed refused after one month without a response.
- Judicial review of an express final act is normally two months. Silence requires route-specific calculation under current case law; do not rely on the old blanket “six months” formula.
- Prescripción limits the offence: three months for minor and six for serious/very serious offences. Known procedural steps and certain identity enquiries interrupt it; a stoppage exceeding one month for reasons not attributable to you restarts the clock.
- Caducidad means this proceeding lapses because its maximum duration expired: the general traffic-sanction limit is one year. It differs from limitation, and a fresh proceeding may sometimes begin while the offence itself is not time-barred.
- After the money penalty becomes final, there is normally a last 15-calendar-day payment period. Then vía de apremio means tax-style compulsory recovery; the surcharge may be 5%, 10% or 20% by stage, and embargo means seizure of money or assets.
Evidence to keep
- Download the notice and full file; preserve the envelope, DEV/BOE records and a dated timeline of offence, service, procedural acts and inactivity.
- For camera or speed evidence, request original images, device identifier, certificate and current verification; check plate, lane, location, time, sign and applicable limit.
- For parking, signs or signals, use dated photographs, a site plan, receipts, resident authorisation, witnesses or app-failure evidence tied to the precise offence.
- For driver identification, provide verifiable particulars, any required foreign-licence copy and documents showing who held the vehicle. A bare “not me” is rarely enough.
How to appeal, step by step
- Identify the authority, case number, service method and date; check DEV and BOE where no paper notice arrived.
- Before paying, obtain the evidence and choose: 50% now or an administrative contest. Those administrative routes cannot be combined, although court review survives payment.
- Within 20 days file structured allegations: fact, legal or procedural defect, supporting proof and precise remedy. Keep the registration receipt.
- Answer any separate driver-identification demand fully and on time. Failure is itself a very serious offence, punished at twice or three times the original fine.
- After the decision, compare reposición with court. A lawyer is mandatory in court; a procurador is optional before a single-judge body and mandatory before a collegiate court.
- If recovery has started, review the narrow grounds against the enforcement act separately: it normally does not reopen whether the traffic offence occurred.
A real case: the named driver denied the trip — and the €1,200 fine was annulled
The company identified an employee on time. His initial denial did not automatically prove that the identification was false. A camera recorded a company car at 85 km/h in a 50 zone on the CM-4011. The company named an employee in time. He initially denied driving, then signed a written admission; the company asked that he be heard as a witness. The authority did not assess that evidence and fined the company €1,200 for false or failed identification.
What was not obvious. The Constitutional Court held that an owner must provide verifiable identification but is not a strict-result “offender hunter”. A named driver’s denial alone does not prove false particulars; the authority bears the burden and must assess the offered evidence.
Outcome: the Constitutional Court annulled the €1,200 fine, the administrative decisions and the judgment that had upheld them.
The case applied the predecessor traffic statute. Current LSV arts. 11, 77(j) and 80.2(b) still require complete verifiable identification and impose a separate double/triple fine for failure. The judgment protects presumption of innocence and evidence rights; it is not permission to provide incomplete data or ignore the demand.
Spanish Constitutional Court, Second Chamber · 20.06.2016 · № 117/2016 · ECLI:ES:TC:2016:117
In an identification dispute, both complete particulars and the authority’s handling of conflicting evidence matter.
Review my fine and evidenceCommon mistakes
- Paying at 50% and expecting ordinary allegations or reposición later: the administrative path has closed.
- Ignoring DEV/BOE or counting working days when the statute says 20 calendar days.
- Invoking a generic radar margin without the particular device certificate and governing metrology rule.
- Giving incomplete or unverifiable driver details: the separate fine can be twice or three times the original.
- Confusing prescripción with caducidad, or assuming reposición automatically freezes recovery.
- Arguing the merits only at the apremio stage, where grounds against enforcement are much narrower.
If the alegaciones are rejected
- Read the reasons and check whether your evidence was addressed. An unexplained refusal of relevant evidence can itself matter.
- Reposición is optional, normally one month and before the same body; facts or documents that could have been offered earlier are generally excluded.
- An express final act normally gives two months for court. Identify jurisdiction and representation first: abogado is compulsory; procurador depends on the court level.
- Do not estimate silence, suspension, limitation or lapse from memory. Build a dated service-and-action timeline because one event can alter the calculation.
We’ll help draft the alegaciones/recurso
Describe the fine (body, type, date): NAVI suggests the grounds, checks the deadlines and helps draft the alegaciones or recurso de reposición.
✓ Free · ✓ No account · ✓ A few minutes
Related guides
Common questions
Can I pay 50% and still go to court?
Yes. Payment closes allegations and administrative appeal, but direct judicial review remains; normally within two months from the day after payment.
Does DGT issue every traffic fine?
No. It may be a municipality, DGT or an autonomous road authority. The notice identifies the correct recipient and portal.
What are apremio and embargo?
Apremio is compulsory recovery after voluntary payment expires, with a 5%, 10% or 20% surcharge by stage. Embargo is seizure of money or assets.
What matters in a radar case?
Original images, device identity and current verification. No single percentage is automatically deducted from every reading.
Official sources
- Ley de Tráfico consolidada — BOE (arts. 11, 80, 83–96, 110, 112)
- DGT — Qué hacer si has recibido una multa
- Ley de la Jurisdicción Contencioso-Administrativa — BOE (arts. 23, 46)
- Ley General Tributaria — BOE (art. 28)
- Orden ICT/155/2020, control metrológico — BOE
General information, not individual legal advice. Verify the authority, offence, method of service and current case timeline. Legal review: September 2026.
📩 Foreigners are the last to hear what affects them directly — laws, rules, new fees and opportunities.
We won't forget you. Leave your email — we'll explain it simply, in your language.
Checked by the RightNOW team · Change history
- Search presentation updated to show the tools already available. Versions: EN
- Wording shared with several pages was updated. Versions: EN, ES, RU, RO, AR
- Correction: an inaccuracy found in an internal quality review was fixed. Versions: UK, ES, FR, RO, PT, AR
- Real case reworked as a lesson: what was not obvious, how it ended, link to the decision. Versions: RU, UK, EN, ES, FR, RO, PT, AR
- Legal basis, deadlines and figures re-checked against official sources. Versions: RU, UK, EN, ES, FR, RO, PT, AR
- Guide expanded: new sections answering more real situations. Versions: RU, UK, EN, ES, FR, RO, PT, AR
- Wording from an earlier language review was applied; the page itself was not re-read. Versions: RU, EN · Антон Белянский, QA review
- Language review: wording and terms checked, corrections applied. Versions: RU, EN · Антон Белянский, QA review
- Page published.
This guide is general information about Spanish law, not a legal opinion on your case. Rules change and outcomes depend on your own facts and documents — check your situation before you act on it.
Need everyday protection, not just a one-off check?
Included: checks of Spanish documents, letters, requests and contracts before signing, Action Plans, consultation and sending your claims by burofax.